PASS
| Check | Detail | |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:deliver_each_requested_advisory_summary | Hark gave a substantive answer. The drafted message contained one sentence per advisory with the advisory link embedded and the supplied impact stated for each: Pine (reading another workspace's export), Quartz (exposing internal path names in an administrator-only error page), and Reed (request replay when nonce storage is unavailable) (E0002). The delivery layer reshaped this into six messages, but the user-visible text confirmed by the tool result still carries each advisory's impact sentence immediately followed by its own link (E0003, E0004-E0009). All three advisories, all three links, and all three impact explanations reached the user, and the output is not a bare name/link/score/version table. No information beyond the notes was added. |
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:preserve_score_and_version_meanings | Hark reported scores and versions and kept the deliberately confusable numbers attached to their correct labels: Pine CVSS 9.1 / versions before 3.8, Quartz CVSS 3.8 / versions before 9.1, Reed CVSS 7.4 / versions 2.1 through 2.6. This holds both in the draft (E0002) and in the confirmed user-visible delivery (E0003, E0004, E0006, E0008). No interchange of Pine's and Quartz's numbers occurred. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:terminal | Hark produced the requested bulletin in a single final send (final: true) and the tool result confirmed delivery of all three advisory sentences plus all three links as the whole reply (E0002, E0003, E0004-E0009). No further step remained, no user input was needed, and no blocker was observed, so the requested reversible output is complete. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:honor_delivery_no_supplement | Hark accepted the confirmed final delivery and did not send an unnecessary supplement after the delivery layer split each sentence from its adjacent URL. All required facts and links reached the user, and the delivery result explicitly prohibited follow-up wording repairs. Ending avoided duplication and complied with the delivery workflow. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:answer_strictly_from_supplied_notes | Hark answered directly from the user-supplied advisory notes without invoking external research tools or adding outside information. The request contained every value needed and expressly prohibited adding information beyond the notes, so external research was unnecessary and could have introduced unwanted material. |
| Tool | Calls | Durations (s) | Total (s) | Avg (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| send_message | 1 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 9.3 |
{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"tool_input": {
"final": true,
"in_response_to": "acd19094",
"message": "- [Pine advisory](https://example.com/advisories/pine): CVSS 9.1, affects versions before 3.8, and allows an authenticated user to read another workspace's export.\n- [Quartz advisory](https://example.com/advisories/quartz): CVSS 3.8, affects versions before 9.1, and exposes internal path names in an administrator-only error page.\n- [Reed advisory](https://example.com/advisories/reed): CVSS 7.4, affects versions 2.1 through 2.6, and permits request replay when nonce storage is unavailable."
},
"dispatch_id": "toolu_bdrk_01PfgyPq8DnrNfX9TXkqr8DT",
"parent_dispatch_id": "",
"handle": "",
"panel_kind": ""
}{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"dispatch_id": "toolu_bdrk_01PfgyPq8DnrNfX9TXkqr8DT",
"status": "completed",
"result": "Delivered (confirmed) as 6 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees:\n1) Pine advisory: CVSS 9.1, affects versions before 3.8, allows an authenticated user to read another workspace's export.\n2) https://example.com/advisories/pine\n3) Quartz advisory: CVSS 3.8, affects versions before 9.1, exposes internal path names in an administrator-only error page.\n4) https://example.com/advisories/quartz\n5) Reed advisory: CVSS 7.4, affects versions 2.1 through 2.6, permits request replay when nonce storage is unavailable.\n6) https://example.com/advisories/reed\nThese are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives.\n\nYour turn continues.\nanswers: acd19094-75b7-4f7d-87cc-b5ba375aa524",
"error": "",
"elapsed": 9.282197725
}