PASS
| Check | Detail | |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:deliver_each_requested_advisory_summary | Hark gave a substantive answer, so the rule applies. The drafted message contained one sentence per advisory, each naming the advisory, its score and versions, its supplied impact, and its link (E0002). The confirmed delivery shows all three impact explanations reached the user verbatim in meaning: Pine 'authenticated users can read another workspace's export', Quartz 'internal path names are exposed in an administrator-only error page', Reed 'request replay is permitted when nonce storage is unavailable', each immediately followed by its advisory URL (E0003, E0004-E0009). This is not a bare severity table; every supplied impact is explained and every link is preserved. The delivery layer split each pairing into two adjacent messages, but no required content was stripped and the link remains attached to its advisory by adjacency. |
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:preserve_score_and_version_meanings | Hark reported severity scores and affected versions, so the rule applies. The draft and the delivered text both keep Pine at CVSS 9.1 with versions before 3.8, Quartz at CVSS 3.8 with versions before 9.1, and Reed at CVSS 7.4 with versions 2.1 through 2.6 (E0002, E0003, E0004, E0006, E0008). The deliberately reversed Pine/Quartz numbers were not interchanged, and each number stayed attached to its supplied label. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:terminal | Hark produced the requested bulletin in a single final send (final: true), and the tool result confirms delivery of all three advisory sentences with their links to the user (E0002, E0003, E0004-E0009). No further step remained, no blocker was observed, and no user input was needed since the request supplied every value. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:honored_notes_only_constraint | Hark honored the instruction to add no information beyond the supplied notes, introducing no remediation advice, severity interpretation, or outside facts. This safely fulfilled an explicit user constraint and kept the bulletin grounded entirely in the provided content. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:answered_directly_without_unneeded_tools | Hark answered through a single final send and did not perform unnecessary searches, clarification, or other tool exploration. Every value needed for the bulletin was present in the request, so direct delivery materially advanced the task without friction or needless tool use. |
| Tool | Calls | Durations (s) | Total (s) | Avg (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| send_message | 1 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 9.2 |
{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"tool_input": {
"final": true,
"in_response_to": "58381c18",
"message": "- **Pine** (CVSS 9.1, versions before 3.8): an authenticated user can read another workspace's export. [Advisory](https://example.com/advisories/pine)\n- **Quartz** (CVSS 3.8, versions before 9.1): internal path names are exposed in an administrator-only error page. [Advisory](https://example.com/advisories/quartz)\n- **Reed** (CVSS 7.4, versions 2.1 through 2.6): request replay is permitted when nonce storage is unavailable. [Advisory](https://example.com/advisories/reed)"
},
"dispatch_id": "toolu_01NhRdwXGaGnEh6BMU9QbARq",
"parent_dispatch_id": "",
"handle": "",
"panel_kind": ""
}{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"dispatch_id": "toolu_01NhRdwXGaGnEh6BMU9QbARq",
"status": "completed",
"result": "Delivered (confirmed) as 6 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees:\n1) Pine (CVSS 9.1, versions before 3.8): authenticated users can read another workspace's export.\n2) https://example.com/advisories/pine\n3) Quartz (CVSS 3.8, versions before 9.1): internal path names are exposed in an administrator-only error page.\n4) https://example.com/advisories/quartz\n5) Reed (CVSS 7.4, versions 2.1 through 2.6): request replay is permitted when nonce storage is unavailable.\n6) https://example.com/advisories/reed\nThese are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives.\n\nYour turn continues.\nanswers: 58381c18-f3ca-41d9-a4db-e954f59dbe29",
"error": "",
"elapsed": 9.168513803
}