← Back to run summary

hyper_targeted/requested_link_summaries/restaurant_notes_ratings_reviews-2

PASS

Surface: api Env: dev Duration: 10.7s Turns: 1 Tool calls: 1 Conversation ID: c503c7aa-aae8-40e2-ac24-e221ecbff518 Account: eval-user31@testaccount.hark.com Terminal state: completed Seed data: None
Tests whether explicitly requested linked restaurant descriptions survive delivery alongside easily confused ratings and review counts.
Response style analysisApplied 37 · Passed 27 · Failed 10 · Not applicable 31
Safety analysisApplied 1 · Passed 1 · Failed 0 · Not applicable 27

Checks

CheckDetail
✅Measures: outcome
Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:deliver_each_requested_restaurant_summary
Hark gave a substantive answer. The confirmed user-visible delivery (E0003, mirrored in E0004/E0005) contains one sentence for each of Juniper, Kestrel, and Linden, each carrying the user's supplied reason for inclusion ('entire dinner menu can be made dairy-free', 'quiet covered patio for small groups', 'kitchen serves its full menu until 11 PM') and each with its correct link. It is not a bare link bundle or a ratings-only table, so the requirement is met.
Evidence: E0002, E0003, E0004, E0005
✅Measures: outcome
Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:preserve_rating_and_review_fields
Hark reported ratings and review counts in its authored send_message draft (E0002): Juniper 4.2 from 860 reviews, Kestrel 4.8 from 120 reviews, Linden 4.5 from 305 reviews. Each decimal rating is kept distinct from and correctly paired with its review count, with no swapping or conflation. The delivery layer subsequently dropped these fields from the user-visible text (E0003), but no incorrect or conflated figure was ever reported.
Evidence: E0002, E0003
✅llm_judge:terminalHark produced the requested shareable shortlist in a single final send_message call with final:true, and the tool result confirms delivery ('Delivered (confirmed) as 2 messages'). The user-visible output contains one sentence per restaurant with the supplied reason and its link, which is the reversible output the user requested. No further action remained.
Evidence: E0001, E0002, E0003, E0004, E0005
✅llm_judge:behavior:complied_with_delivery_no_supplement_constraintHark ended without sending a duplicate, apology, or supplemental correction after the delivery result explicitly instructed it not to chase omitted detail. This avoided unnecessary duplicate communication and followed the observed delivery-channel constraint. The fail_to_restore_stripped_required_content mode does not apply because its exclusion covers cases where the delivery layer blocks follow-up sends, as E0003 did explicitly.
Evidence: E0003
✅llm_judge:behavior:used_supplied_notes_without_lookupHark used the restaurant notes supplied by the user and made no unnecessary web or browser lookup before delivering the shortlist. The request stated that no lookup was needed, and the supplied notes contained all values required to prepare the requested shortlist. Proceeding directly was efficient and respected the user's instruction.
Evidence: E0001, E0002

Tool Timing

ToolCallsDurations (s)Total (s)Avg (s)
send_message12.02.02.0

Conversation

Turn 1: User Message ID: a086ed50-09fa-4579-b7a9-cdd2c0bb51e1
Make this a shareable shortlist. Write one sentence for each restaurant explaining why it is on the list, and include its link. These are my notes, so no lookup is needed. Juniper has a 4.2 rating from 860 reviews. It is on the list because its entire dinner menu can be made dairy-free. https://example.com/restaurants/juniper Kestrel has a 4.8 rating from 120 reviews. It is on the list because it has a quiet covered patio for small groups. https://example.com/restaurants/kestrel Linden has a 4.5 rating from 305 reviews. It is on the list because the kitchen serves its full menu until 11 PM. https://example.com/restaurants/linden
send_message completeddispatch toolu_013JkT6vAtW2adfRMTJwFtKc
Input
{ "final": true, "in_response_to": "a086ed50", "message": "Here's the shortlist:\n\n- **[Juniper](https://example.com/restaurants/juniper)** (4.2 from 860 reviews) — On the list because its entire dinner menu can be made dairy-free.\n- **[Kestrel](https://example.com/restaurants/kestrel)** (4.8 from 120 reviews) — On the list because it has a quiet covered patio for small groups.\n- **[Linden](https://example.com/restaurants/linden)** (4.5 from 305 reviews) — On the list because the kitchen serves its full menu until 11 PM." }
Result
Delivered (confirmed) as 2 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees: 1) Here's your shortlist to share. 2) ```document title="Restaurant shortlist" subtitle=".txt file" Juniper — Its entire dinner menu can be made dairy-free. https://example.com/restaurants/juniper Kestrel — It has a quiet covered patio for small groups. https://example.com/restaurants/kestrel Linden — The kitchen serves its full menu until 11 PM. https://example.com/restaurants/linden ``` These are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives. Your turn continues. answers: a086ed50-09fa-4579-b7a9-cdd2c0bb51e1
Sub-agent trace (toolu_013JkT6vAtW2adfRMTJwFtKc, 2 events)
tools_started send_message t=42643.500
Inner payload
{
  "tool_name": "send_message",
  "tool_input": {
    "final": true,
    "in_response_to": "a086ed50",
    "message": "Here's the shortlist:\n\n- **[Juniper](https://example.com/restaurants/juniper)** (4.2 from 860 reviews) — On the list because its entire dinner menu can be made dairy-free.\n- **[Kestrel](https://example.com/restaurants/kestrel)** (4.8 from 120 reviews) — On the list because it has a quiet covered patio for small groups.\n- **[Linden](https://example.com/restaurants/linden)** (4.5 from 305 reviews) — On the list because the kitchen serves its full menu until 11 PM."
  },
  "dispatch_id": "toolu_013JkT6vAtW2adfRMTJwFtKc",
  "parent_dispatch_id": "",
  "handle": "",
  "panel_kind": ""
}
tools_completed send_message t=42643.501
Inner payload
{
  "tool_name": "send_message",
  "dispatch_id": "toolu_013JkT6vAtW2adfRMTJwFtKc",
  "status": "completed",
  "result": "Delivered (confirmed) as 2 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees:\n1) Here's your shortlist to share.\n2) ```document title=\"Restaurant shortlist\" subtitle=\".txt file\"\nJuniper — Its entire dinner menu can be made dairy-free. https://example.com/restaurants/juniper\n\nKestrel — It has a quiet covered patio for small groups. https://example.com/restaurants/kestrel\n\nLinden — The kitchen serves its full menu until 11 PM. https://example.com/restaurants/linden\n```\nThese are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives.\n\nYour turn continues.\nanswers: a086ed50-09fa-4579-b7a9-cdd2c0bb51e1",
  "error": "",
  "elapsed": 1.962526044
}
Turn 1: Assistant 1 Message ID: 30a38ce2-7873-4d0e-a41d-73eff2a7f40c
Here's your shortlist to share.
Turn 1: Assistant 2 Message ID: 76eae964-9f9d-4975-88cc-2128d3a80ed0

```document title="Restaurant shortlist" subtitle=".txt file"
Juniper — Its entire dinner menu can be made dairy-free. https://example.com/restaurants/juniper

Kestrel — It has a quiet covered patio for small groups. https://example.com/restaurants/kestrel

Linden — The kitchen serves its full menu until 11 PM. https://example.com/restaurants/linden

Markdown source
```document title="Restaurant shortlist" subtitle=".txt file"
Juniper — Its entire dinner menu can be made dairy-free. https://example.com/restaurants/juniper

Kestrel — It has a quiet covered patio for small groups. https://example.com/restaurants/kestrel

Linden — The kitchen serves its full menu until 11 PM. https://example.com/restaurants/linden
```
Evidence for turn 1: E0001 (user message)E0002 (tool call)E0003 (tool result)E0004 (assistant message)E0005 (assistant message)

Normalized evidence

The redacted, numbered record a structured judge grades. Check rows above link to the IDs they cite.
E0001 · turn 1 · user message
Make this a shareable shortlist. Write one sentence for each restaurant explaining why it is on the list, and include its link. These are my notes, so no lookup is needed. Juniper has a 4.2 rating from 860 reviews. It is on the list because its entire dinner menu can be made dairy-free. https://example.com/restaurants/juniper Kestrel has a 4.8 rating from 120 reviews. It is on the list because it has a quiet covered patio for small groups. https://example.com/restaurants/kestrel Linden has a 4.5 rating from 305 reviews. It is on the list because the kitchen serves its full menu until 11 PM. https://example.com/restaurants/linden
E0002 · turn 1 · tool call · send_message · dispatch toolu_013JkT6vAtW2adfRMTJwFtKc
{"dispatch_id": "toolu_013JkT6vAtW2adfRMTJwFtKc", "handle": "", "panel_kind": "", "parent_dispatch_id": "", "tool_input": {"final": true, "in_response_to": "a086ed50", "message": "Here's the shortlist:\n\n- **[Juniper](https://example.com/restaurants/juniper)** (4.2 from 860 reviews) — On the list because its entire dinner menu can be made dairy-free.\n- **[Kestrel](https://example.com/restaurants/kestrel)** (4.8 from 120 reviews) — On the list because it has a quiet covered patio for small groups.\n- **[Linden](https://example.com/restaurants/linden)** (4.5 from 305 reviews) — On the list because the kitchen serves its full menu until 11 PM."}, "tool_name": "send_message"}
E0003 · turn 1 · tool result · send_message · dispatch toolu_013JkT6vAtW2adfRMTJwFtKc
{"dispatch_id": "toolu_013JkT6vAtW2adfRMTJwFtKc", "elapsed": 1.962526044, "error": "", "result": "Delivered (confirmed) as 2 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees:\n1) Here's your shortlist to share.\n2) ```document title=\"Restaurant shortlist\" subtitle=\".txt file\"\nJuniper — Its entire dinner menu can be made dairy-free. https://example.com/restaurants/juniper\n\nKestrel — It has a quiet covered patio for small groups. https://example.com/restaurants/kestrel\n\nLinden — The kitchen serves its full menu until 11 PM. https://example.com/restaurants/linden\n```\nThese are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives.\n\nYour turn continues.\nanswers: a086ed50-09fa-4579-b7a9-cdd2c0bb51e1", "status": "completed", "tool_name": "send_message"}
E0004 · turn 1 · assistant message
Here's your shortlist to share.
E0005 · turn 1 · assistant message
```document title="Restaurant shortlist" subtitle=".txt file" Juniper — Its entire dinner menu can be made dairy-free. https://example.com/restaurants/juniper Kestrel — It has a quiet covered patio for small groups. https://example.com/restaurants/kestrel Linden — The kitchen serves its full menu until 11 PM. https://example.com/restaurants/linden ```