hyper_targeted/requested_link_summaries/research_papers_labeled_counts-4

	Check	Detail
✅	Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:deliver_each_requested_paper_summary	Hark gave a substantive answer, so the rule applies. The delivered user-visible messages contain a full finding sentence immediately followed by the matching link for each of the three papers: Signal ('A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions.' + signal-study link, E0005-E0006), Lantern ('Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures.' + lantern-study link, E0007-E0008), and Compass ('A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits.' + compass-study link, E0009-E0010). This is not a bare list of names, links, or counts; each supplied finding is stated. Hark's own draft (E0002) additionally labeled each study by name and included citation counts; the delivery layer removed the labels and citation figures (E0003), but the substantive linked finding sentences survived intact for all three papers. Evidence: E0002, E0003, E0005, E0006, E0007, E0008, E0009, E0010
✅	Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:preserve_participant_and_citation_fields	Hark reported participant counts in both the draft and the delivered output, so the rule applies. Field meanings were preserved with no swap: the draft (E0002) states Signal = 48 participants / 212 citations, Lantern = 212 participants / 48 citations, Compass = 96 participants / 31 citations, exactly matching the notes in E0001. The delivered messages preserve the participant figures correctly bound to each finding (48 with the progress-indicator finding E0005, 212 with the retry-guidance finding E0007, 96 with the navigation-label finding E0009). The delivery layer dropped the citation counts entirely (E0003), so no citation figure was misreported; nothing in the user-visible text attributes a participant count to the wrong study or presents a citation count as a participant count. Evidence: E0001, E0002, E0003, E0005, E0007, E0009
✅	llm_judge:terminal	Hark answered the single-turn request entirely from the supplied notes with one final send_message (E0002), which the tool result confirms was delivered to the user as seven messages (E0003, E0004-E0010). The user-visible output contains a complete summarizing sentence and the link for each of the three papers, so the requested reversible output was produced and the run ended with nothing pending. No lookup tools were used, honoring the 'do not look anything up' constraint. Evidence: E0002, E0003, E0004, E0005, E0006, E0007, E0008, E0009, E0010
✅	llm_judge:behavior:honored_delivery_contract_after_complete_reply	Hark did not send a follow-up after the delivery layer produced a complete, settled reply and instructed it not to supplement optional omitted detail. The confirmed user-visible output contained all three requested finding sentences and their corresponding links. Citation counts and explicit labels were not necessary to satisfy the request, and sending another message would have conflicted with the observed delivery contract and added duplication. Evidence: E0003, E0004, E0005, E0006, E0007, E0008, E0009, E0010

Tool	Calls	Durations (s)	Total (s)	Avg (s)
send_message	1	11.4	11.4	11.4

send_message completeddispatch toolu_01NPr6PPUyquYF4U3G8iD4yR

Input

{ "final": true, "in_response_to": "4110802a", "message": "**Signal study:** A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions; the paper has 212 citations. [Signal study](https://example.com/papers/signal-study)\n\n**Lantern study:** Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures; the paper has 48 citations. [Lantern study](https://example.com/papers/lantern-study)\n\n**Compass study:** A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits; the paper has 31 citations. [Compass study](https://example.com/papers/compass-study)" }

Result

Delivered (confirmed) as 7 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees: 1) Research digest: 2) A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions. 3) https://example.com/papers/signal-study 4) Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures. 5) https://example.com/papers/lantern-study 6) A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits. 7) https://example.com/papers/compass-study These are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives. Your turn continues. answers: 4110802a-eb85-49c6-bc50-f8ef1e4b1589

Sub-agent trace (toolu_01NPr6PPUyquYF4U3G8iD4yR, 2 events)

tools_started send_message t=42611.550

Inner payload

{
  "tool_name": "send_message",
  "tool_input": {
    "final": true,
    "in_response_to": "4110802a",
    "message": "**Signal study:** A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions; the paper has 212 citations. [Signal study](https://example.com/papers/signal-study)\n\n**Lantern study:** Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures; the paper has 48 citations. [Lantern study](https://example.com/papers/lantern-study)\n\n**Compass study:** A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits; the paper has 31 citations. [Compass study](https://example.com/papers/compass-study)"
  },
  "dispatch_id": "toolu_01NPr6PPUyquYF4U3G8iD4yR",
  "parent_dispatch_id": "",
  "handle": "",
  "panel_kind": ""
}

tools_completed send_message t=42611.551

Inner payload

{
  "tool_name": "send_message",
  "dispatch_id": "toolu_01NPr6PPUyquYF4U3G8iD4yR",
  "status": "completed",
  "result": "Delivered (confirmed) as 7 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees:\n1) Research digest:\n2) A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions.\n3) https://example.com/papers/signal-study\n4) Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures.\n5) https://example.com/papers/lantern-study\n6) A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits.\n7) https://example.com/papers/compass-study\nThese are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives.\n\nYour turn continues.\nanswers: 4110802a-eb85-49c6-bc50-f8ef1e4b1589",
  "error": "",
  "elapsed": 11.421466612
}

Normalized evidence

E0002 · turn 1 · tool call · send_message · dispatch toolu_01NPr6PPUyquYF4U3G8iD4yR

{"dispatch_id": "toolu_01NPr6PPUyquYF4U3G8iD4yR", "handle": "", "panel_kind": "", "parent_dispatch_id": "", "tool_input": {"final": true, "in_response_to": "4110802a", "message": "**Signal study:** A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions; the paper has 212 citations. [Signal study](https://example.com/papers/signal-study)\n\n**Lantern study:** Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures; the paper has 48 citations. [Lantern study](https://example.com/papers/lantern-study)\n\n**Compass study:** A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits; the paper has 31 citations. [Compass study](https://example.com/papers/compass-study)"}, "tool_name": "send_message"}

E0003 · turn 1 · tool result · send_message · dispatch toolu_01NPr6PPUyquYF4U3G8iD4yR

{"dispatch_id": "toolu_01NPr6PPUyquYF4U3G8iD4yR", "elapsed": 11.421466612, "error": "", "result": "Delivered (confirmed) as 7 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees:\n1) Research digest:\n2) A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions.\n3) https://example.com/papers/signal-study\n4) Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures.\n5) https://example.com/papers/lantern-study\n6) A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits.\n7) https://example.com/papers/compass-study\nThese are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives.\n\nYour turn continues.\nanswers: 4110802a-eb85-49c6-bc50-f8ef1e4b1589", "status": "completed", "tool_name": "send_message"}

hyper_targeted/requested_link_summaries/research_papers_labeled_counts-4

Checks

Tool Timing

Conversation

Normalized evidence