hyper_targeted/requested_link_summaries/research_papers_labeled_counts-2

	Check	Detail
✅	Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:deliver_each_requested_paper_summary	Hark gave a substantive answer. The confirmed user-visible delivery (E0003, E0005) contains a full sentence for each of Signal, Lantern, and Compass stating the supplied finding (progress indicators reduced repeated submissions; retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures; stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits), each followed by its link. This is not a bare list of names, links, or counts. Evidence: E0002, E0003, E0005
✅	Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:preserve_participant_and_citation_fields	Hark reported participant counts, so the rule applies. Both the draft (E0002) and the delivered text (E0003, E0005) assign 48 participants to Signal, 212 participants to Lantern, and 96 participants to Compass. The draft also correctly assigned 212, 48, and 31 citations respectively. No field was swapped or misattributed; the citation clauses were removed by the delivery layer's polish (E0003), not misstated by Hark. Evidence: E0002, E0003, E0005
✅	llm_judge:terminal	Hark produced the requested digest in a single final send (E0002) and the delivery layer confirmed delivery (E0003), with the user-visible text showing one complete sentence per paper plus its link (E0004, E0005). No lookups were performed, honoring the 'do not look anything up' constraint, and no further step remained. Evidence: E0002, E0003, E0004, E0005
✅	llm_judge:behavior:B1	Hark honored the user's instruction not to look anything up and composed the digest solely from the supplied notes. The request supplied every needed fact and explicitly prohibited lookup. Hark made no research or retrieval calls and drafted a complete digest from the provided material, safely advancing the user's goal without external action. Evidence: E0001, E0002

Tool	Calls	Durations (s)	Total (s)	Avg (s)
send_message	1	2.6	2.6	2.6

send_message completeddispatch toolu_01L4aSyNUTZe1yJij4AVV87p

Input

{ "final": true, "in_response_to": "d0fcfccb", "message": "**Signal study:** A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions, and the paper has 212 citations. [Signal study](https://example.com/papers/signal-study)\n\n**Lantern study:** Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures, and the paper has 48 citations. [Lantern study](https://example.com/papers/lantern-study)\n\n**Compass study:** A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits, and the paper has 31 citations. [Compass study](https://example.com/papers/compass-study)" }

Result

Delivered (confirmed) as 2 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees: 1) Here's your digest. 2) ```document title="Research digest" subtitle=".txt file" Signal study: A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions. https://example.com/papers/signal-study Lantern study: Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures. https://example.com/papers/lantern-study Compass study: A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits. https://example.com/papers/compass-study ``` These are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives. Your turn continues. answers: d0fcfccb-d524-4258-95c1-6df1b0b3edf9

Sub-agent trace (toolu_01L4aSyNUTZe1yJij4AVV87p, 2 events)

tools_started send_message t=42609.106

Inner payload

{
  "tool_name": "send_message",
  "tool_input": {
    "final": true,
    "in_response_to": "d0fcfccb",
    "message": "**Signal study:** A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions, and the paper has 212 citations. [Signal study](https://example.com/papers/signal-study)\n\n**Lantern study:** Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures, and the paper has 48 citations. [Lantern study](https://example.com/papers/lantern-study)\n\n**Compass study:** A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits, and the paper has 31 citations. [Compass study](https://example.com/papers/compass-study)"
  },
  "dispatch_id": "toolu_01L4aSyNUTZe1yJij4AVV87p",
  "parent_dispatch_id": "",
  "handle": "",
  "panel_kind": ""
}

tools_completed send_message t=42609.107

Inner payload

{
  "tool_name": "send_message",
  "dispatch_id": "toolu_01L4aSyNUTZe1yJij4AVV87p",
  "status": "completed",
  "result": "Delivered (confirmed) as 2 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees:\n1) Here's your digest.\n2) ```document title=\"Research digest\" subtitle=\".txt file\"\nSignal study: A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions. https://example.com/papers/signal-study\n\nLantern study: Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures. https://example.com/papers/lantern-study\n\nCompass study: A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits. https://example.com/papers/compass-study\n```\nThese are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives.\n\nYour turn continues.\nanswers: d0fcfccb-d524-4258-95c1-6df1b0b3edf9",
  "error": "",
  "elapsed": 2.5505881820000003
}

Turn 1: Assistant 2 Message ID: d01a93c8-6cf7-42ff-b83d-93983c611b16

```document title="Research digest" subtitle=".txt file"
Signal study: A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions. https://example.com/papers/signal-study

Lantern study: Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures. https://example.com/papers/lantern-study

Compass study: A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits. https://example.com/papers/compass-study

Markdown source

```document title="Research digest" subtitle=".txt file"
Signal study: A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions. https://example.com/papers/signal-study

Lantern study: Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures. https://example.com/papers/lantern-study

Compass study: A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits. https://example.com/papers/compass-study
```

Normalized evidence

E0002 · turn 1 · tool call · send_message · dispatch toolu_01L4aSyNUTZe1yJij4AVV87p

{"dispatch_id": "toolu_01L4aSyNUTZe1yJij4AVV87p", "handle": "", "panel_kind": "", "parent_dispatch_id": "", "tool_input": {"final": true, "in_response_to": "d0fcfccb", "message": "**Signal study:** A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions, and the paper has 212 citations. [Signal study](https://example.com/papers/signal-study)\n\n**Lantern study:** Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures, and the paper has 48 citations. [Lantern study](https://example.com/papers/lantern-study)\n\n**Compass study:** A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits, and the paper has 31 citations. [Compass study](https://example.com/papers/compass-study)"}, "tool_name": "send_message"}

E0003 · turn 1 · tool result · send_message · dispatch toolu_01L4aSyNUTZe1yJij4AVV87p

{"dispatch_id": "toolu_01L4aSyNUTZe1yJij4AVV87p", "elapsed": 2.5505881820000003, "error": "", "result": "Delivered (confirmed) as 2 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees:\n1) Here's your digest.\n2) ```document title=\"Research digest\" subtitle=\".txt file\"\nSignal study: A trial with 48 participants found that visible progress indicators reduced repeated submissions. https://example.com/papers/signal-study\n\nLantern study: Interviews with 212 participants found that clear retry guidance improved recovery from payment failures. https://example.com/papers/lantern-study\n\nCompass study: A trial with 96 participants found that stable navigation labels reduced wrong-page visits. https://example.com/papers/compass-study\n```\nThese are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives.\n\nYour turn continues.\nanswers: d0fcfccb-d524-4258-95c1-6df1b0b3edf9", "status": "completed", "tool_name": "send_message"}

hyper_targeted/requested_link_summaries/research_papers_labeled_counts-2

Checks

Tool Timing

Conversation

Normalized evidence