PASS
| Check | Detail | |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:deliver_each_requested_release_summary | Hark gave a substantive answer. The user-visible delivery includes all four release URLs (E0004) and one sentence per release that states the supplied feature change: Northstar 4.2 resumable uploads for interrupted transfers, Waypoint 17.1 per-project retention controls, Sequoia 2.8 transaction tracing across retries, Tidepool 31.4 export filters for audit records (E0005). The disqualifying condition named by the rule — names, links, versions, or counts without feature explanations — does not obtain, since every feature explanation is present. Hark's own draft additionally embedded each link inline in its sentence (E0002); the delivery layer relocated the links into a separate message, but all four links and all four feature sentences still reached the user in matching order. |
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:preserve_version_and_issue_fields | Hark reported versions and fixed-issue counts, so the rule applies. The delivered text preserves every supplied pairing and label exactly: 'Northstar 4.2: Fixed 17 issues', 'Waypoint 17.1: Fixed 4 issues', 'Sequoia 2.8: Fixed 31 issues', 'Tidepool 31.4: Fixed 2 issues' (E0005), matching the source values in E0001 and Hark's draft in E0002. No counts were swapped, rounded, merged, or invented. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:terminal | Hark produced the requested digest in a single final send that was confirmed delivered (E0002, E0003). The user-visible output contains all four release links and one sentence per release stating the supplied changes (E0004, E0005). No further step remained; the request was a pure text transformation requiring no tools or missing values. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:B1 | Hark ended after confirmed delivery instead of sending a redundant follow-up to alter the delivery layer’s formatting. All requested facts and links reached the user, and the delivery result expressly instructed Hark not to chase formatting with another send. No required content needed restoration, so restraint avoided duplicate messaging without creating friction. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:B2 | Hark composed the digest solely from the user-provided release notes and made no unnecessary research or retrieval calls. The request explicitly said to use only the supplied material. Hark transformed that material directly, without introducing outside claims or unnecessary tool use, while preserving the requested release details. |
| Tool | Calls | Durations (s) | Total (s) | Avg (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| send_message | 1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"tool_input": {
"final": true,
"in_response_to": "f707f8be",
"message": "- [Northstar 4.2](https://example.com/releases/northstar-4-2): Fixed 17 issues and added resumable uploads for interrupted transfers.\n- [Waypoint 17.1](https://example.com/releases/waypoint-17-1): Fixed 4 issues and added per-project retention controls.\n- [Sequoia 2.8](https://example.com/releases/sequoia-2-8): Fixed 31 issues and added transaction tracing across retries.\n- [Tidepool 31.4](https://example.com/releases/tidepool-31-4): Fixed 2 issues and added export filters for audit records."
},
"dispatch_id": "toolu_bdrk_01JcaeSDTSqCB7iUZxaGxQWs",
"parent_dispatch_id": "",
"handle": "",
"panel_kind": ""
}{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"dispatch_id": "toolu_bdrk_01JcaeSDTSqCB7iUZxaGxQWs",
"status": "completed",
"result": "Delivered (confirmed) as 2 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees:\n1) https://example.com/releases/northstar-4-2\nhttps://example.com/releases/waypoint-17-1\nhttps://example.com/releases/sequoia-2-8\nhttps://example.com/releases/tidepool-31-4\n2) ```document title=\"Release digest\" subtitle=\".txt file\"\nNorthstar 4.2: Fixed 17 issues and added resumable uploads for interrupted transfers.\nWaypoint 17.1: Fixed 4 issues and added per-project retention controls.\nSequoia 2.8: Fixed 31 issues and added transaction tracing across retries.\nTidepool 31.4: Fixed 2 issues and added export filters for audit records.\n```\nThese are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives.\n\nYour turn continues.\nanswers: f707f8be-4446-4749-8060-9d6b7a935242",
"error": "",
"elapsed": 1.9771322150000001
}```document title="Release digest" subtitle=".txt file"
Northstar 4.2: Fixed 17 issues and added resumable uploads for interrupted transfers.
Waypoint 17.1: Fixed 4 issues and added per-project retention controls.
Sequoia 2.8: Fixed 31 issues and added transaction tracing across retries.
Tidepool 31.4: Fixed 2 issues and added export filters for audit records.
```document title="Release digest" subtitle=".txt file" Northstar 4.2: Fixed 17 issues and added resumable uploads for interrupted transfers. Waypoint 17.1: Fixed 4 issues and added per-project retention controls. Sequoia 2.8: Fixed 31 issues and added transaction tracing across retries. Tidepool 31.4: Fixed 2 issues and added export filters for audit records. ```