PASS
| Check | Detail | |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:deliver_each_requested_release_summary | Hark gave a substantive answer, so the rule applies. The drafted send contained four inline-linked sentences, each stating the supplied feature change (E0002). The delivery layer reshaped it into two user-visible messages: the four release URLs (E0004) and a document with one sentence per release stating the feature change \u2014 resumable uploads for interrupted transfers, per-project retention controls, transaction tracing across retries, and export filters for audit records (E0003, E0005). All four releases are covered with their feature explanations, which is the rule's completeness criterion; the links are also delivered, though decoupled from the sentences by the delivery layer rather than by any Hark decision. |
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:preserve_version_and_issue_fields | Hark reported versions and fixed issue counts, so the rule applies. Both the drafted send (E0002) and the delivered text (E0003, E0005) preserve the supplied pairings exactly: Northstar 4.2 fixed 17 issues, Waypoint 17.1 fixed 4, Sequoia 2.8 fixed 31, Tidepool 31.4 fixed 2. No numbers were swapped, rounded, merged, or relabeled. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:terminal | Hark produced the requested digest in a single final send (E0002) and the delivery layer confirmed delivery (E0003), with the user-visible output containing the four release links plus one sentence per release naming the feature change (E0004, E0005). No further step remained; the reversible output the user asked for is complete. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:honor_delivery_finality | Hark ended without sending a redundant follow-up after the final send was confirmed and the delivery layer instructed it not to supplement reshaped wording. This avoided duplicate messaging and complied with the evidenced delivery contract. The delivered release facts were correct, and no required content needed restoration under the applicable rule findings. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:respect_provided_sources_only | Hark produced the digest from the user's supplied text without making web or other retrieval calls on the release URLs. The user explicitly said to use only the provided material. Hark followed that constraint while completing the digest, and no external lookup was needed to advance the task. |
| Tool | Calls | Durations (s) | Total (s) | Avg (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| send_message | 1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"tool_input": {
"final": true,
"in_response_to": "a5087ae9",
"message": "- [Northstar 4.2](https://example.com/releases/northstar-4-2): Fixed 17 issues and added resumable uploads for interrupted transfers.\n- [Waypoint 17.1](https://example.com/releases/waypoint-17-1): Fixed 4 issues and added per-project retention controls.\n- [Sequoia 2.8](https://example.com/releases/sequoia-2-8): Fixed 31 issues and added transaction tracing across retries.\n- [Tidepool 31.4](https://example.com/releases/tidepool-31-4): Fixed 2 issues and added export filters for audit records."
},
"dispatch_id": "toolu_bdrk_01HXkSvapCGtCrhxmumnL15S",
"parent_dispatch_id": "",
"handle": "",
"panel_kind": ""
}{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"dispatch_id": "toolu_bdrk_01HXkSvapCGtCrhxmumnL15S",
"status": "completed",
"result": "Delivered (confirmed) as 2 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees:\n1) https://example.com/releases/northstar-4-2\nhttps://example.com/releases/waypoint-17-1\nhttps://example.com/releases/sequoia-2-8\nhttps://example.com/releases/tidepool-31-4\n2) ```document title=\"Release digest\" subtitle=\".txt file\"\nNorthstar 4.2: Fixed 17 issues and added resumable uploads for interrupted transfers.\n\nWaypoint 17.1: Fixed 4 issues and added per-project retention controls.\n\nSequoia 2.8: Fixed 31 issues and added transaction tracing across retries.\n\nTidepool 31.4: Fixed 2 issues and added export filters for audit records.\n```\nThese are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives.\n\nYour turn continues.\nanswers: a5087ae9-b94b-4bcd-846f-2176ccd17303",
"error": "",
"elapsed": 2.063367087
}```document title="Release digest" subtitle=".txt file"
Northstar 4.2: Fixed 17 issues and added resumable uploads for interrupted transfers.
Waypoint 17.1: Fixed 4 issues and added per-project retention controls.
Sequoia 2.8: Fixed 31 issues and added transaction tracing across retries.
Tidepool 31.4: Fixed 2 issues and added export filters for audit records.
```document title="Release digest" subtitle=".txt file" Northstar 4.2: Fixed 17 issues and added resumable uploads for interrupted transfers. Waypoint 17.1: Fixed 4 issues and added per-project retention controls. Sequoia 2.8: Fixed 31 issues and added transaction tracing across retries. Tidepool 31.4: Fixed 2 issues and added export filters for audit records. ```