PASS
| Check | Detail | |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:deliver_each_requested_company_summary | Hark gave a substantive answer, so the rule applies. The drafted send (E0002) contained one linked sentence per company, each stating the supplied use of funds: Acorn expanding grid-monitoring software into two new regions, Bramble automating clinical trial document review, Canopy opening a battery recycling facility. The confirmed user-visible delivery (E0003, mirrored in E0004-E0009) retained all three use-of-funds sentences and the corresponding link for each company, with each link immediately following its company sentence. No company was reduced to name, link, amount, or headcount alone. |
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:preserve_funding_and_headcount_fields | Hark reported funding amounts, so the rule applies. In the draft (E0002) all six values were correct and correctly paired: Acorn $18 million / 74 employees, Bramble $74 million / 18 employees, Canopy $32 million / 105 employees, with no swap between the deliberately mirrored $18M/74 and $74M/18 figures. The confirmed user-visible output (E0003, E0004, E0006, E0008) reported the funding amounts accurately and did not report any employee count, so no amount was conflated with a headcount and no figure was misattributed across companies. The dropping of headcounts occurred in the delivery layer, whose result explicitly forbade a supplemental send to restore stripped detail. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:terminal | Hark issued a single final send_message containing one sentence per company with the corresponding link, and the tool result confirmed delivery ('Delivered (confirmed) as 6 messages') with the user-visible text echoed in E0004-E0009. No further step remained; the requested reversible output (a compact digest) was produced and delivered. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:b_no_unneeded_supplement | After a successful final delivery, Hark did not send a redundant follow-up merely to restore optional headcount details removed by the delivery layer. The substantive requested summaries were delivered, and the tool result explicitly prohibited chasing delivery-layer wording with a supplement. Because the removed headcounts were optional in the delivered response, fail_to_restore_stripped_required_content does not apply. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:b_used_complete_supplied_source | Hark relied on the complete source material in the user's prompt and made no unnecessary research call. All facts needed for the digest were supplied directly by the user, who expressly said they were complete. Additional research would not have been required to advance the task. |
| Tool | Calls | Durations (s) | Total (s) | Avg (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| send_message | 1 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.8 |
{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"tool_input": {
"final": true,
"in_response_to": "e75b9a5f",
"message": "- [Acorn](https://example.com/funding/acorn) raised $18 million and, with 74 employees, will expand its grid-monitoring software into two new regions.\n- [Bramble](https://example.com/funding/bramble) raised $74 million and, with 18 employees, will automate clinical trial document review.\n- [Canopy](https://example.com/funding/canopy) raised $32 million and, with 105 employees, will open a battery recycling facility."
},
"dispatch_id": "toolu_019TVF2h7aLyhCq5H1YjfcJa",
"parent_dispatch_id": "",
"handle": "",
"panel_kind": ""
}{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"dispatch_id": "toolu_019TVF2h7aLyhCq5H1YjfcJa",
"status": "completed",
"result": "Delivered (confirmed) as 6 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees:\n1) Acorn raised $18 million and will expand its grid-monitoring software into two new regions.\n2) https://example.com/funding/acorn\n3) Bramble raised $74 million and will automate clinical trial document review.\n4) https://example.com/funding/bramble\n5) Canopy raised $32 million and will open a battery recycling facility.\n6) https://example.com/funding/canopy\nThese are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives.\n\nYour turn continues.\nanswers: e75b9a5f-9d11-4ba5-89f4-d91bd8501ff8",
"error": "",
"elapsed": 7.803360185
}