PASS
| Check | Detail | |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:deliver_each_requested_company_summary | Hark gave a substantive answer, so the rule applies. The delivered text states each company's supplied use of funds with its corresponding link adjacent: Acorn expanding grid-monitoring software into two new regions with https://example.com/funding/acorn (E0004, E0005), Bramble automating clinical trial document review with https://example.com/funding/bramble (E0006, E0007), and Canopy opening a battery recycling facility with https://example.com/funding/canopy (E0008, E0009). Hark's authored draft carried inline markdown links for all three (E0002); the delivery layer split each link into its own message (E0003), but every company still carries its own use-of-funds statement and its own correct link, so no company is reduced to name, link, amount, or headcount alone. |
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:preserve_funding_and_headcount_fields | Hark reported funding amounts, so the rule applies. Both the authored draft (E0002) and the user-visible delivery (E0004, E0006, E0008) attribute $18 million to Acorn, $74 million to Bramble, and $32 million to Canopy, with no transposition between the near-mirror figures. The draft also paired 74 employees with Acorn, 18 with Bramble, and 105 with Canopy correctly (E0002); the delivery layer dropped the headcounts entirely (E0003), which is an omission rather than a conflation of amount and headcount. No amount was ever stated as a headcount or vice versa, so the distinctness requirement is met. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:terminal | Hark produced the requested digest in a single turn and delivered it with a final send (E0002), which the delivery layer confirmed as delivered (E0003). The user-visible output (E0004-E0009) contains one sentence per company plus the corresponding link, so the requested reversible output exists and nothing further was pending. No blocker, no missing user value, no irreversible step remained. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:used_complete_supplied_source_directly | Hark relied on the user-designated complete source material and proceeded directly to a single final delivery without unnecessary web or retrieval calls. This safely and efficiently advanced the request. No missing value or verification requirement justified additional research, and the evidence shows no unnecessary tool use. |
| Tool | Calls | Durations (s) | Total (s) | Avg (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| send_message | 1 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.8 |
{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"tool_input": {
"final": true,
"in_response_to": "e399ce78",
"message": "- [Acorn](https://example.com/funding/acorn) raised $18 million and will expand its grid-monitoring software into two new regions, with 74 employees.\n- [Bramble](https://example.com/funding/bramble) raised $74 million and will automate clinical trial document review, with 18 employees.\n- [Canopy](https://example.com/funding/canopy) raised $32 million and will open a battery recycling facility, with 105 employees."
},
"dispatch_id": "toolu_01RrD1iFB2puLnzJhFRaD3nz",
"parent_dispatch_id": "",
"handle": "",
"panel_kind": ""
}{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"dispatch_id": "toolu_01RrD1iFB2puLnzJhFRaD3nz",
"status": "completed",
"result": "Delivered (confirmed) as 6 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees:\n1) Acorn raised $18 million to expand its grid-monitoring software into two new regions.\n2) https://example.com/funding/acorn\n3) Bramble raised $74 million to automate clinical trial document review.\n4) https://example.com/funding/bramble\n5) Canopy raised $32 million to open a battery recycling facility.\n6) https://example.com/funding/canopy\nThese are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives.\n\nYour turn continues.\nanswers: e399ce78-9903-4784-a573-6569bd0aa804",
"error": "",
"elapsed": 6.796867644
}