PASS
| Check | Detail | |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:deliver_each_requested_event_summary | Hark gave a substantive answer, so the rule applies. The confirmed delivered output contains one sentence for each of Meadow, Harbor, Orbit, and Summit, and each sentence carries the supplied topic: accessible labels improving keyboard navigation, planning safe database migrations, measuring battery degradation, and incident handoffs between engineering teams (E0003, E0004, E0006, E0008, E0010). Each event's link is delivered immediately with its sentence (E0005, E0007, E0009, E0011), so every event is linked. The output is not a bare link list nor a names-and-numbers schedule: all four descriptions were preserved. Hark's own draft placed the link inline in each sentence as a markdown link (E0002); the delivery layer split the URL into an adjacent message, but the linkage and all four topics survived. |
| ✅ | Measures: outcome Check Unique ID: llm_judge:rule:preserve_time_and_attendance_fields | Hark reported both start times and attendance, so the rule applies. Every start time is presented as a time with its AM/PM unit and matches the source: Meadow 8:05 AM, Harbor 10:30 AM, Orbit 1:15 PM, Summit 4:45 PM (E0004, E0006, E0008, E0010). Every registration count is presented as attendance with the 'attendees' unit and matches the source: 130, 85, 45, 215. No attendance number appears in a time position and no unit was stripped, in either Hark's draft (E0002) or the confirmed delivered text (E0003). |
| ✅ | llm_judge:terminal | Hark issued a single final send_message that was confirmed delivered (E0002, E0003), and the user-visible output contains all four requested event descriptions with their links (E0004-E0011). No further step remained; the requested reversible output was produced in full, so the run is completed. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:chronological_event_order | Hark reordered the events into chronological start-time order while preserving all supplied content. The unsolicited organization was harmless and accurate, did not violate an ordering requirement, and did not materially change the task. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:accepted_successful_delivery_without_duplicate | Hark accepted the confirmed reshaped delivery and did not send a redundant follow-up after verifying that all required content survived. No required content was stripped, and the delivery result expressly discouraged supplements. Ending avoided duplicate user-facing messages without leaving work incomplete. |
| ✅ | llm_judge:behavior:respected_no_web_instruction | Hark complied with the user's instruction not to check the web and composed the response solely from the provided event details. Avoiding unnecessary retrieval directly honored the user's explicit constraint while still completing the request in full. |
| Tool | Calls | Durations (s) | Total (s) | Avg (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| send_message | 1 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 11.3 |
{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"tool_input": {
"final": true,
"in_response_to": "7f58fb49",
"message": "- [Meadow talk](https://example.com/events/meadow-talk): Starting at 8:05 AM with 130 registered attendees, this talk explains how accessible labels improve keyboard navigation.\n- [Harbor workshop](https://example.com/events/harbor-workshop): Starting at 10:30 AM with 85 registered attendees, this workshop teaches teams how to plan safe database migrations.\n- [Orbit panel](https://example.com/events/orbit-panel): Starting at 1:15 PM with 45 registered attendees, this panel covers practical methods for measuring battery degradation.\n- [Summit clinic](https://example.com/events/summit-clinic): Starting at 4:45 PM with 215 registered attendees, this clinic demonstrates incident handoffs between engineering teams."
},
"dispatch_id": "toolu_01GuFZvPT6aLtBXnjS1jzHHX",
"parent_dispatch_id": "",
"handle": "",
"panel_kind": ""
}{
"tool_name": "send_message",
"dispatch_id": "toolu_01GuFZvPT6aLtBXnjS1jzHHX",
"status": "completed",
"result": "Delivered (confirmed) as 8 messages. Your draft was polished into texting register, so the wording differs from what you wrote; this is exactly what the user sees:\n1) Meadow talk at 8:05 AM (130 attendees) explains how accessible labels improve keyboard navigation.\n2) https://example.com/events/meadow-talk\n3) Harbor workshop at 10:30 AM (85 attendees) teaches teams how to plan safe database migrations.\n4) https://example.com/events/harbor-workshop\n5) Orbit panel at 1:15 PM (45 attendees) covers practical methods for measuring battery degradation.\n6) https://example.com/events/orbit-panel\n7) Summit clinic at 4:45 PM (215 attendees) demonstrates incident handoffs between engineering teams.\n8) https://example.com/events/summit-clinic\nThese are your words now, and this is the whole reply: the delivery layer chose its density and shape by design. Never dispute, re-explain, or apologize for the phrasing, and never send a supplement to restore detail it left out. Only a final send settles its request. Never chase wording with another send. If a fact in it is wrong and would change what the user does, correct it when their next message arrives.\n\nYour turn continues.\nanswers: 7f58fb49-1265-46d6-96b7-bb88dc0a1081",
"error": "",
"elapsed": 11.276892901
}